More Nix commentary and gruvbox colorscheme
This commit is contained in:
parent
54eb0dc42b
commit
5457f0d980
4 changed files with 23 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -34,16 +34,16 @@ And two, not-insignificant portions of the internet _already are_ subscription b
|
|||
Sometimes you will even come across people who go as far to genuinely proclaim the preceding.
|
||||
To those people, the only thing I can do is quote the classic "You wouldn't download a car, would you?"
|
||||
Shortly followed by saying "Yes I fucking would, given the opportunity"
|
||||
No one owes you shit based on the amount of people have ignore the ads on your website.
|
||||
No one owes you shit based on the amount of people have ignored the ads on your website.
|
||||
|
||||
Then there is also the argument to be made that ads steal one's attention.
|
||||
The goal here being to manipulate you into buying their product.
|
||||
The goal here being to manipulate you into buying a product.
|
||||
|
||||
Much like with piracy, the you're not missing out on anything.
|
||||
The only way you would've seen any money from it, would be when you're audience directly sees your content and happens to get an ad shoved in their face.
|
||||
Though I suppose in the case of ads, your audience has no choice but to support you when they don't use an adblocker.
|
||||
In other words, you are forcing your audience to sacrifice their a part attention to support you, whether they want to or not.
|
||||
In my opinion, this makes it morally wrong to make monkey off of ads.
|
||||
In my opinion, this makes it morally wrong to make money off of ads.
|
||||
|
||||
I'd argue it is a moral imperative to use an adblocker.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue